This tweet is a response to a report that a woman had to remove a Blue Lives Matter flag to comply with her home owners association.
1. Who benefits from this tweet would be anyone who believes that the Black Lives Matter movement is a “terrorist group” with anti-police goals and who support the Blue Lives Matter movement. This tweet also affects supporters of the Black lives movement as they are addressed through the author’s use of “#BlackLivesMatter.”
2. What- A counter-argument for this tweet would be that it is hypocritical to treat Black Lives Matter one way for not following the law, while treating a Blue Lives Matter activist differently when they break a rule.
3. Where- In real life this statement might be found in conversation with police supporters, their families, retired officers, or people who dislike Black Live Matter.
4. When- We can expect this to change when there is a consensus between police departments and the American people on how much force is appropriate for a police officer to use in self-defense when the threat they face is unknown. Also we will solve when we determine when it is appropriate to limit free speech. Should the woman be allowed to fly the flag as long as athletes can protest during the “Star Spangled Banner”?
5. Why- People should know about this because, while there is a need to address police violence, there appears to be a need to address the freedom of speech and concerns of those who view police violence a means to defending a “Blue Life.”
6. How- This harms others by taking a movement aimed at protecting lives and characterizing it as a terrorist organization solely by isolating it in the context of how it may have influenced the home owners association to have the flag removed. Rather than simply advocating for lawlessness and harming cops, in the tweeter’s eyes, Black Lives Matter has elevated to impinging upon free speech.


